southpaw a écrit :Pat, il y a suffisamment de bonnes guitares dans le monde, pourquoi va-tu chercher des bouses pareilles, t'es un vrai pervers.
Si tu l'achètes tu ne la recevras jamais .... MR DOUANE te dira qu'elle n'est pas bien... 
chris30660 a écrit :
patpick59 a écrit :chris30660 a écrit :
Si c'est pas écrit "contrefaçon" sur le document d'importation je pense que ça risque de passer souvent à travers quand même
gibson a une usine en Chine, il parait (à vérifier) que les Douanes US on saisi des corps chinois (donc des vrais gibson made in China) sans indication d'origine. Toujours d'après radio chiottes, une enquête est en cours pour vérifier si gibson n'américanise pas ses produits chinois, du vrai faux quoi.
Faudrait vérifier ça sur le net, parait aussi que Gibson serait au bord de la reprise par F....r ????
southpaw a écrit :... un point c'est tout.
southpaw a écrit :L A l'époque les Ibanez "lawsuit" ressemblaient comme deux gouttes d'eau aux Gibson mais elles étaient marquées "Ibanez" et ils ont pris un méchant procès.
.
Wiki a écrit :In 1998 PRS released their "Singlecut" guitar, which bore some resemblance to the venerable Les Paul, Gibson Guitar Corp filed a trademark infringement against Paul Reed Smith. An injunction was ordered[1] and PRS stopped manufacture of the Singlecut at the end of 2001. Federal District Court Judge William J. Haynes, in a 57-page decision ruled "that PRS [Paul Reed Smith] was imitating the Les Paul" and gave the parties ninety days "to complete any discovery on damages or disgorgement of PRS's profits on the sales of its offending Singlecut guitar."
In 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed the lower court decision and ordered the dismissal of Gibson's suit against PRS. The decision also immediately vacated the injunction prohibiting the sale and production of PRS’s Singlecut Guitar. Paul Reed Smith Guitars announced that it would immediately resume production of its Singlecut guitars.
Paul Smith, the founder of PRS, stated "We are delighted that the appellate court affirmed what we and the industry have long known: the PRS Singlecuts are musical instruments of the highest quality that would never be confused with a competitor’s product."
Gibson tried and failed to have the case reheard by all twenty-four Sixth Circuit judges (denied in December 2005) and then by the United States Supreme Court (denied June 2006), which was their last chance to have their original injunction upheld.
In the litigation, Gibson alleged that concert goers in a smoky concert hall might not be able to differentiate a PRS Singlecut from a Gibson Les Paul. The appellate court rejected that trademark theory out-of-hand, emphasizing Gibson’s concession in court arguments that “only an idiot” would confuse the two products at the point of sale.
While no changes to the design of the Singlecut occurred as a result of the lawsuit (given that Gibson lost), some Singlecut owners and sellers have erroneously adopted the term 'pre-lawsuit' to differentiate their Singlecut from others.
southpaw a écrit :Chinoises moog, chinoises pas japonaises
Croquignol a écrit :
Donc, si cette guitare c'est comme le Tang, hé ben ça m'étonnerait qu'elle se bonifie avec le temps.
Si ça c'est pas un putain d'argument!
Retourner vers « Belles Guitares Gauchères »
Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum : Googlebot/2.1 et 1 invité
Welcome to RIFF GAUCHE. Click here to register
